r1 - 09 Apr 2008 - 19:38:11 - CtsiBreadYou are here: TWiki >  CTSpedia Web > Articles > KGrants > IntroToK4

Writing the Environment and Institutional Commitment to Candidate Section

Start Presentation

Slide 1: Section 3: Environment and Institutional Commitment to Candidate

  • Evaluation criteria (Environment):
    • Adequacy of research facilities and the availability of appropriate educational opportunities.
    • Quality and relevance of the environment for scientific and professional development of the candidate.

Slide 2: Section 3: Environment

  • Describe the research facilities and educational opportunities of the sponsoring institution (UCSF) that are related to the candidate's career development training and research plans.
  • Include relevance of each component to your career development plan.
  • Describe resources outside UCSF, as needed.

Slide 3: Section 3: Institutional Commitment

  • Evaluation criteria (Institutional Commitment)
    • Applicant institution's commitment to the scientific development of the candidate and assurances that the institution intends the candidate to be an integral part of its research program.
    • Applicant institution's commitment to protect at least 75% of the candidate's effort for proposed career development activities.
    • These assurances are stated in a letter from your department chair (see Example 8).
      • Note: For fellows, this letter must state that you will be promoted from your current position to a 'higher' position (ideally, to a full-time faculty position) during the K award period.

Slide 4: 3 Sealed Letters of Recommendation

  • Letters should be from senior investigators who have competed successfully for NIH funding and have been involved in the training of junior investigators.
  • Can be from any period in your career (e.g., medical school, residency).
  • Cannot be from your primary mentor or co-mentors.

Slide 5: Letters of Recommendation (cont'd)

  • Letters should address the candidate's potential for a research career.
    • Potential for conducting research
    • Evidence of originality
    • Adequacy of scientific background
    • Quality of research endeavors or publications to date
    • Commitment to patient-oriented research
    • Need for further research experience and training

Slide 6: Letters of Recommendation (cont'd)

  • NIH recommends that you send each of them a self-addressed envelope with the following words in the front bottom corner: DO NOT OPEN PHS USE ONLY
    • Envelopes should be sealed, with the author's signature across the sealed flap.
    • Sealed letters should be sent to the candidate.
    • Sending a prepaid FED EX order form will ensure prompt delivery of sealed letters.

 
Edit | WYSIWYG | Attach | Printable | Raw View | Backlinks: Web, All Webs | History: r1 | More topic actions
 
CTSpedia knowledge base
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License". Content on CTSpedia is covered by disclaimers.

Copyright © by the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding CTSpedia? Send feedback
This site is powered by TWIKI.NET's Certified TWikiPowered by TWIKI.NET