Beta Testing for VEST/PREDICTS Adjudication Form

Comments by Step #:

#############################

BOTH

#############################

1) The adjudication website pages include the footer link to SFCC at the bottom of all pages. Can we drop that and put something similar to what's mocked-up in the screenshot (I'll try to include a screenshot)? Fixed-TP

2) For both clinical event and device event wizards (again, I'll try to add a screenshot to the wiki illustrating):

Fixed-TP

Could you also make a slight tweek to the clinical event data entry and the device event date entry worksheet templates?

#############################

Device event form http://altjira:55000/frmDeviceEventWizard.aspx

###########################

1

- Should look like this, as per the email:

1 - Ventricular tachyarrhythmia a –Ventricular fibrillation (VF) b –Polymorphic VT (pVT) c – Monomorhic VT (mVT) 2 – Atrial fibrillation 3 - Other Supraventricular tachycardia a –atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia b -sinus tachycardia c -other SVT 4 - Oversensing 5 - Malfunction 6 - Other_________

4

- now when I click on the device adjudication link I am taken to step 4 and can't get to the beginning - even if I answer the remaining questions and finish. [jd]

#############################

Clinical event form http://altjira:55000/frmClinicalEventWizard.aspx

#############################

10

-Wizard does not deselect AV node dysfunction subtype options or Sinus node dysfunction subtype options, if you click on this arrhythmia type and then unselect it. [jd]

28

- should be reconciled with data from the "Outcome Report" CRF; discordances should be flagged for Jim or Lewis to review (if site says they died and adjudicator says they didn't, or vice-versa). [TP: Please discuss this reconciliation requirement with Mario] [MJP - Discussed with Mario and Jim and Lewis - Mario will flag cases with discrepancies for review by Jim or Lewis, who will resolve the discrepancy before the case is sent to other adjudicators and/or finalized] - Jim, let me know if this issue has been worked out.

(sorry) resolution seems fine to me [jd]