Tags:
create new tag
, view all tags, tagging instructions
Return to Browse by

Return to RCR Case Studies

Please Comment on the Teaching Quality of the CASE

 

Please rate the CASE:

  • 5 stars = highest rating
  • 1 star = lowest rating
  • SCORE = average of all votes
Graph Rating
Score: 0, My vote: 0, Total votes: 0

EthicsCaseStudyForm edit

Title Human Subjects
Long Title Compensation for participation
Contributor/Contact Daniel T. Lackland, DRPH (lackland@musc.edu)
Contributor Details Daniel T. Lackland, DRPH
Department of Neurosciences
Institute of Human Values in Health Care
Medical University of South Carolina
CTSA MUSC
Case Study Provided A study includes a 6-week period and a 24-hour dietary recall and 2 twelve hour urine collects. The PI is able to offer compensation for participation. The IRB will approve the MAXIMUM level of compensation.
Data Acquisition, Management, Sharing and Ownership Topics

Mentor and Trainee Responsibilities Topics

Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship Topics

Peer Review Topics

Collaborative Science Topics

Research Misconduct Topics

Conflicts of Interest, Law and Policy Topics

Human Subjects No human subjects, Human subjects research
Citation

URL https://sctr.musc.edu
RCR Keyword

Other RCR Keywords Compensation; IRB, PI
Type of Case

Source for Topic Areas Du Bois, J., & Dueker, J. (2009). Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report. Journal of Research Administration, 40(1), 49-70.
References

Other

Topic revision: r1 - 04 Jan 2012 - 13:13:57 - DebieSchilling
 
Copyright & by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding CTSPedia? Send feedback